The King. The James. The Bible.
King James the VI of Scotland and I of England authorized the translation of the King James Bible in 1604 soon after he ascended the throne of England after his cousin Queen Elizabeth I’s death in 1603. To this day there is no small controversy surrounding this king.
Endear James to the heart of KJV-only folk as an anti-Catholic “evangelical Christian” seems to be a priority in many a KJV-only work. No time is wasted in polishing his reputation and he emerges the greatest most godly monarch Britain ever had, and I must say he probably was. From what I’ve seen he was an exceptionally godly man in a long line of monarchs who were quite the opposite.
King James Playlist
Here we will add all of our videos relating to King James. We are also saving videos about King James on YouTube as we find them. I haven’t watched all of them and I do not necessarily endorse them all or agree with what they say. I include a mixture so you can see what is being said and conduct further research.
For King and Cabal
Barbara Aho’s interviews are detailed and informative. Claims that Francis Bacon’s involvement in the final editing of the KJV is her main concern. We were fascinated and we hope you will be too! By the way, I have no idea what the secret book of David Bay is, but I have some suspicions. The interview also ends with a huge question relating to William Shakespeare. Let me know what you think.
My last correspondence with Barbara revealed she has reopened the possibility of Rosicrucian involvement in the final rendering of the KJV. That’s all we know so far. Check out more of Barbara’s AUDIO PRESENTATIONS with the Berean Chronicles radio broadcast. God bless!
A Famous Homosexual Monarch
According to David Teems, author of Majestie, James did possess some “homosexual tendencies” which were awakened by the mere presence of a French-Catholic cousin of his, . These “tendencies” were not unusual in a child of James’s upbringing. He knew neither of his parents and was literally starved for affection. As Teems observes, had a young lady relative visited the young James, these feelings may never have been aroused. Interestingly enough, James went on to shame every homosexual of our day in skillfully converting this same French-Catholic cousin to Protestantism, as Teems documents.
Teems does not provide details on these “tendencies” after his youth and especially after his marriage to Anne of Denmark. Of course, any KJV-only Baptist (like myself) does not like the idea of my Bible being spearheaded by a flaming gay monarch. A book by Stephen Coston entitled King James Unjustly Accused, first recommended to me by Gail Riplinger during one of our long telephone calls, goes into great depths explaining how James could not have been a homosexual due to his loving relationship with his wife Anne, his many children, and the fact that he wrote against homosexuality and effeminacy to his son Henry in the Basilikon Doron (the Kingly Gift).
Often those who wish to sling an inverted rainbow over the King’s name say he leaned heavily on his favorites fail to recognize, as Teems does, that doe to his foot and leg deformities (possibly due to an early case of childhood rickets), James often needed to lean heavily on anyone near by. There are many other “He Said, She Said” stories discussed in a chapter by the same title in Coston’s book (chapter 8, p. 217-242). It is unfortunate that this book is so expensive as it is going for over $500 at the time of this writing. I’m fortunate to have gotten my own years ago for under $100. If you are curious about its content, reach out to me and I may do a video series on it some time.
I want to maintain a healthy distance from the extreme of assuming that there was not a sliver of homosexuality in James’s entire frame Ultimately, neither you nor I ever asked him. The truth is he may have had some slivers especially in his youth, repented of them and grown to be a godly Christian monarch. It’s not impossible to repent of less than godly feelings and turn to Christ (unless you’re Stephen Anderson and hold what I feel is an unbiblical reprobate doctrine). I look forward to peering more intensely into the life of everyone’s favorite king in the future.
All that being said, it is strange that the modern LGBTQXYZ+-@$#! community would even want him to grace their hall of PRIDE considering the morbidly dark history most Harry Potter fans hate him for.
The Witch Trial Murders
Thou shalt not suffer witches to live. (Exodus 22:18, Wycliffe Bible)
You shall not allow a sorceress to live. (Exodus 22:18, Legacy Standard Bible)
You’ve no doubt read those verses before multiple times and probably fall into one of three categories: (1) you don’t think witchcraft exists, (2) you think everything supernatural is witchcraft (kinda like King James), or (3) you are a witch. Either way, welcome! 😁
Innocence Under Fire
The young James had many attempts on his life as well as many kidnapping attempts. A little king makes an excellent hostage and an even better political bargaining chip. Thank God they were all failed attempts. I’ve often wondered how many of these were Jesuitical campaigns. If memory serves, James did claim these attempts on him were instigated by witches, and H.P. Blavatsky notes the Society of Jesus as the most powerful sorcerers (often called witches as in the Wycliffe Bible) on the planet.
But, witchcraft ceased many full moons ago, right? From what I’ve learned from former witches and Satanists, it is alive, well, and more wide-spread than is comfortable to think about. I recommend check out our page on the Ex-Vampire, search the Confessionals episodes for “witch“, and prepare to be concerned.
The Gale
Witches can control the weather. I’ve heard lots of stories, even ones that have happened in my life time. They obviously can’t do it all the time, or it would never rain on Halloween. Sometimes the magic works, sometimes it doesn’t and other times it’s not worth it. Also, servant’s of Satan do not seem to be the only ones capable of such feats, unless you count the shadow government and people who seem to have, for lack of a better term, powers. But this time, when a storm exclusively pestered James and his queen, something diabolical could have been afoot. Here’s what he said:
For more on weather manipulation, see The Confessionals Episode 60: A Real Life X-Man. The Confessionals has several ot/her episodes that discuss similar “powers”, but I don’t remember which ones.
The Daemonologie
King James wrote his Daemonologie as a dialogue between a fictional someone who seems to have done all together too much study on witchcraft a an individual who was all together too curious. Their interactions are designed to make an very heavy subject a little more interesting.
They could not have been guilty.
I watched this documentary but was not impressed. It’s by Timeline on YouTube and called The Witch-Hunter King: James I’s Crusade On Witchcraft. Most of the way through, I got home and was pretty unimpressed. I got tired of the hype and sensationalism pretty quickly. Not only that, but I noticed some points where the authors likely made the wording vague so they could keep the sensationalism and not have to pay for it. If you watch it carefully (I’d actually recommend listening to it at least once so the imagery doesn’t distract you.
In this documentary, a lady says the women accused of witchcraft couldn’t have been guilty of what they were accused of. It was unclear if she meant that Satan does not possess a physical butt that one can kiss, that witchcraft doesn’t have the powers ascribed to it, or simply that the practice of witchcraft don’t exist in her opinion. Either way, they could have actually done exactly what they were accused of in my humble opinion. The problem is, even if these things did happen, were the accused women actually the ones doing it?
One witch claimed that she could discern other witches by a specific mark in their eye. She accused many, and I’m unclear how many suffered from it, but she was later found out to be a scammer…probably. I have my suspicions.
Where I disagree with The Daemonologie
Briefly, James seems to have written off all angelic appearances as demonic, much like a modern Baptist. In his Daemonologie he writes,
Epistemon
Was it not evil enough to deceive simple ignorants, in making them to take him for an angel of light, and so to account of God’s enemy, as of their particular friend: where by the contrary, all we that are Christians ought assuredly to know that since the coming of Christ in the flesh, and establishing of his church by the apostles, all miracles, visions, prophecies, and appearances of angels or good spirits are ceased. Which served only for the first sowing of faith, and planting of the church. Where now the church being established, and the white horse whereof I spoke before, having made his conquest, the law and prophets are thought sufficient to serve us, or make us inexcusable, as Christ says in his parable of Lazarus and the
rich man (Luke 16).(The Demonology of King james I: Includes the Original Text of Daemonologie and News from
Scotland by Donald Tyson, p. 160)
I don’t want to be quick to agree with James, but I will say there have been several stories where an angel or a dead grandpa was pretty obviously something dark in disguise. Folks who deal with seeing the unseen all the time need some understanding, however. I’ve heard that if you are actually seeing demons all the time you need to be seeing angels too, or there may be something seriously wrong.
Also on the issue of angels having children with human women and creating monsters, James says through his Epistemon,
Epistemon
These tales are nothing but aniles fabulae. For that they have no semen of their own, I have shown you already. And that the cold semen of a dead body can work nothing in generation, it is more than plain, as being already dead of itself as well as the rest of the body is, wanting the natural heat, and such other natural operations, as are necessary for working that effect. And in case such a thing were possible (which were all utterly against all rules of nature), it would breed no monster, but only such a natural offspring as would have come between that man or woman and that other abused person, in case they both being alive had had ado with [each] other.For the Devil’s part therein is but the naked carrying or expelling of that substance, and so it could not participate with no quality of the same. Indeed, it is possible to the craft of the Devil to make a woman’s belly to swell after he hath that way abused her, which he may do either by stirring up her own humor, or by herbs, as we see beggars daily do; and when the time of her delivery should come to make her labor with great anguish, like unto that natural course, and then subtly to slip into the midwife’s hands sticks, stones, or some monstrous child brought from some other place. But this is more reported and guessed at by others, than believed by me.
(The Demonology of King james I: Includes the Original Text of Daemonologie and News from
Scotland by Donald Tyson, p. 164-165)
There are many good evidences of the monsters Philomathes is concerned about. I’d say Bigfoot is one of the most popular examples in modern times. How much of our modern sensibilities about the supernatural actually come from this influential book by King James?
Was King James a New Ager??
Appareny, yes, because he disagrees with Gail Riplinger on the word “Lucifer”:
Gail claims
[NABV]
Contrary to Gail’s ill-founded claims, King James wrote in his Daemonologie:
Philomathes
And what makes the spirits have so different names from others?Epistemon
Even the knavery of that same Devil, who as he deludes the necromancers with innumerable feigned names for him and his angels, as in particular making Satan, Beelzebub, and Lucifer to be three different spirits, where we find the two former but different names given to the prince of all the rebelling angels by the Scripture. As by Christ, the prince of all the devils is called Beelzebub in that place which I alleged against the power of any heretics to cast out devils. By john in the Revelation, the old tempter is called Satan, the prince of all the evil angels. And last, to wit, Lucifer is but by allegory taken from the Day Star7 (so named in diverse places of the Scriptures) because of his excellence (I mean the prince of them) in his creation before his fall. Even so I say he deceives the witches by attributing to himself diverse names, as if every different shape that he transforms himself into were a different kind of spirit.…
[Author Donald Tyson writes] Note 7: The planet Venus, when seen in the mornings in the east, is known as the Morning Star, and was sometimes poetically re-ferred to as Lucifer, a name that literally means “light-bringing” or “light-bearer” (lucis: “light,” ferre: “to bear”). It is fabled to be the original name of Satan before his expulsion from heaven.
THE DEMONOLOGY OF KING JAMES I by DONALD TYSON, p. 175 and 178
Perhaps Gail was unaware of King James’s statements? In her book In Awe of Thy Word, Gail quotes freely and extensively from the Daemonologie. Are we to believe she never noticed this passage? If she did – which it is nearly certain she did – did she not simply say James was not infallible in his opinions as she often says of others who disagree with her conclusions? Was it because James’s statements simply blow her shallow case out of the proverbial water? I don’t know. Let me know what you think below.
James & The Giant Pumpkin
Obeying the Bible’s command to not suffer a witch to live is not easy work when you are King of England, but there’s a problem. Just like with drugs, abusers, con artists, Satanists, (and politicians), the ones that are doing the most damage and are actually in control are almost never the ones who suffer. James and the public at large were successful in torturing and killing a lot of women and a few men, but 400 years later it is difficult to tell how many of them were actually guilty and how many had a confession literally twisted out of them.
It is interesting to note that a confession was believed to cause a witch to lose her powers. The implications, however are downright horrifying. What if you had no confession to make, but you were accused nonetheless? Simply put, you’d probably have to confess or be tortured to death. Under this type of circumstances, how many guiltless victims would suffer? The Inquisition of mainland Europe was famous for killing “heretics” (Protestant Christians), political opponents and other threats to papal authority, as witches and sorcerers. Lets just say I have a lot of questions.
How many Inquisitors were actually Satanists (like Malachi Martin says are prevalent in Jesuitism and the Vatican) but got away with it because they used their power “to the greater glory of God”? How many witches were killed because they wouldn’t use their powers for God or simply wouldn’t sleep with Quasimodo’s wicked step-father? How many kings were blackmailed by papists by lending their supernatural services to them? How many witches accused their rivals and got away with their own practices? How many evil husbands took the opportunity to get their wife killed off so they could get the girl next door? How have these witch hunts been used to further the agenda of the New World Order in whose shadow we all now live?
To that last point, King James authorized a Bible and has name has been attached to it for a long time. Witches and Harry Potter fans alike have been trained to think of James as a black-hearted witch hunter. What a turn off for the Bible to bear his name! Let alone the the Bible’s clear teaching against witchcraft, a King James Bible might as well be called the “I Want to Kill You Bible”. Not a great situation for cult evangelism to say the least! But, was James even guilty of the involvement in the trials he is credited with, or is this a set up to turn witches off the Bible which bears his name? More on this later.
This has often made me wonder, was the Revised Version (and any subsequent versions) made to appeal to the wider public which was growing more friendly toward magic, fortune-telling, spell-casting, and necromancy in the late 1800s and even more so today?
Food for thought I suppose. Let me know what you think below.
Was James hiding in the Giant Pumpkin the whole time??
Was King James himself involved in the conspiracy against the Bible?? Personally, I am unconvinced that James was was involved in the conspiracy behind yet contrary to the government of Britain and Christianity. But, for openness sake, I’m going to tell you what I have heard.
The Royal Families (including the Stewarts, of which James was a part) have always had connections with the Illuminati (as do royals around the world for obvious reasons). James is often credited with forming the Masonic Lodge of Scotland and involving Rosecrucian Francis Bacon (to whom the KJV Codes are often atributed) in the final editing of the KJV, but these accusations are usually made by folks who are openly trying to give James a black eye. Barbara Aho says James was not necessarily involved in the conspiracy himself but implies that he was aware of it and she trusts he was the exception and not involved. In her interviews with Kelly McGinley, she details how James fought the conspiracy all his life and how is was them trying to kill him. (See For King and Cabal playlist.)
I suppose it is possible that James’s persecution of witches may have been a guise to cover up his real intentions. In that case I see some possibilities. Either (1) he disregarded the life of his cult’s witch peons, (2) they actually wanted to be “sacrificed” for the greater good of the cult (which some shockingly beg for the “honor” of being murdered for the greater “good”), (3) James was involved in an occult war for power and dominance among the occult factions and killing off witches gained him their power, or (4) and — possibly the worst of all — he purposely misidentified witches and killed innocent women so the witches could get away with it. (Note: if the Collin’s, or Todd, family was involved in the Salem witch trials, I suspect number 4 was true in America.)
This is more of a thought exploration than anything else. If James was secretly given over to homosexuality, it is certainly not the argument. The argument is that it was his open and public fascination. But, if he was openly writing against the occult an and homosexuality, while secretly being involved in them, it would make the situation so much worse. Not only could we not trust a word he wrote on the matter, but we would be defending a liar with the only evidence available: the evidence of primary sources. If all the evidence that he was homosexual is intentionally falsified and all the primary information is based on a coverup, James was a masterfully cunning deceiver and it’s impossible to actually know anything. This is a common pitfall of too much conspiracy theorizing in which it is best to get off YouTube for a while and read a book.
Obviously, King James Bible believers don’t want James to be involved in the conspiracy. Neither do I. The verifiable evidence so far does not point this direction. I will say that I don’t believe such ideas will hold up under the magnifying lens of documentable history. But, just in case these suspicions are accurate, I don’t mind being in on the ground floor of their exposure. In the mean time, relax, it’s just a conspiracy theory.
You can see more about the dark of the Royal Families in Bill Schnoebelen’s videos on DEVILS OF WINDSOR: Dark Secrets of the British Royal Family and Part 2.
What do you think about all this? I would love to hear your thoughts below!
Rite of the Divine King
James was a passionate advocate for the Divine Right of Kings, the belief that the authority of the King was given by God and He alone was above the king and could take this the divine power from him. He even wrote a book about it called The True Law of Free Monarchies. This belief is contrary to that of the young James’s primary tutor. David Teems mentions that James was frequently taught that the people give the king his authority and that they have the power to take it from him. This latter belief is common in America and is what I was taught as well. How many KJV-only authors sanctify the Divine Right of Kings or just don’t talk about it?
In DIANA: PAGAN RITE of the DIVINE KING!, Bill Schnobelen exposes a practice that could be based on, or at least named as a mockery of James’s belief. In this case, witches actually wanted to kill him, but were happy with a substitute!
In Ken Johnson’s books, especially The New Covenant of Damascus, we see specific examples of foreknowledge concerning Christ in the Old Testament times. Most of this information was lost and suppressed by the time He actually arrived. However, for millennia, the Messiah was anticipated as a King would die in the place of His people to deliver them form their sin nature. This concept would become corrupted by various pagan/occult groups in the Rite of the Divine King.
The Rite of the Divine King, according to Schnoebelen’s video, himself a former witch and Satanist, is built on the idea that in times of great turmoil, the King must die for the people. If the King does not want to die, however, or is unavailable, a substitute may be sacrificed in his place. See also Bill’s article September-October 98 Liberator Rite of the Divine King.
Was this ritual developed and named during the witch hunts to mock James and his beliefs and set him up as a target? Did some obscure witch speak a prophecy over James foretelling the great persecution of witches that he would initiate, thus painting a target on the back of his onesie? Could this explain why there were so many attempts on the young James?
Food for thought. Let me know what you think in the form below!
Malicious History
Was James even guilty of the involvement in the trials he is credited with, or is this a set up to turn witches off the Bible which bears his name? Researcher Joe Kasti (now AC Vines) says, no! But, I have not read his book…yet.
KJV Conception: Not What You Thought
Why do you think the KJV was born out of a pure desire for a perfect Bible? That’s what ALL KJV gate-keepers claim citing the Hampton Court Conference where Puritans complained about currently available versions “not answering to the original” and that they wanted a final Bible that would be the best ever. Maybe the KJV has had the greatest influence of any Bible in all history, but it’s inception was not quite so inspiring as we were led to believe.
The KJV translation project kicked off in a much more fascinating way than we expected! Enjoy this lesson from history teacher, KJV researcher, and pastor Bryan Ross to find out more!
Bible Version Conspiracy 